Reforestation in Slovakia: History, current practice and perspectives

  • Ivan Repáč Faculty of Forestry, Department of Silviculture, Technical University of Zvolen, Masarykova 24, 960 53 Zvolen, Slovakia
  • Zuzana Parobeková Faculty of Forestry, Department of Silviculture, Technical University of Zvolen, Masarykova 24, 960 53 Zvolen, Slovakia
  • Matúš Sendecký Faculty of Forestry, Department of Silviculture, Technical University of Zvolen, Masarykova 24, 960 53 Zvolen, Slovakia
Keywords: Reforestation, Planting, Nursery practices, Seedling quality, Seedling field performance, History, Slovakia

Abstract

The history of reforestation in Slovakia is long and rich; from reforestation by seeding, through the small forest nurseries, reforestation of extreme degraded and high-mountain sites to the current The Act on forest reproductive material, nursery centers and reforestation of large windthrow areas. After brief introduction of the history, rather large part of this review is dedicated to the current nursery and especially reforestation practices – planning, pre-planting site preparation, seeding and planting techniques, post-planting care, monitoring of planting performance. Recent nursery and planting research activities are given very shortly. Perspective nursery (e.g. improvement of seedlings’ quality by inoculation with beneficial microorganisms, vegetative propagation) and reforestation treatments and practices (e.g. the use of larger amount of container-grown seedlings, application of hydrogels and ectomycorrhizal fungi, progressive seeding technique, underplanting) are relatively in detail but of course not comprehensively discussed finally. Despite of the lack of a complex reforestation strategy and current and possibly future financial sources and personnel limitations, the introduced perspective practices should contribute to successful solution of reforestation challenges following from endangering the forests by climate change.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ammer C, Bickel E, Kölling C (2008) Converting Norway spruce stands with beech − a review of arguments and techniques. Austrian J For Sci 125:3-26.

APA (2015) Slovakia − Rural Development Program (National), Version of 1.3.2015. http://www.apa.sk/index.php?start&navID=496

BartoÅ¡ J, Jurásek A, RáÄková E (2007) Economics aspects of the use of containerized beech planting stock. In: Management of forests in changing environmental conditions (Saniga M et al. (eds.)). Technical University in Zvolen, pp 66−73. [in Czech with English abstract]

Barzdajn W (2010) The growth of the Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) culture established at different planting times using container and bare-root seedlings. Sylwan 154:312-322.

Bending GD, Poole EJ, Whipps JM, Read DJ (2002) Characterisation of bacteria from Pinus sylvestris−Suillus luteus mycorrhizas and their effects on root-fungus interactions and plant growth. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 39:219-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-6496(01)00215-x

Bošeľa M, Petráš R, Sitková Z, Priwitzer T, Pajtík J, Hlavatá H, Sedmák R, Tobin B (2014) Possible causes of the recent rapid increase in the radial increment of silver fir in the Western Carpathians. Environ Pollut 184:211-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.08.036

Buraczyk W, Szeligowski H, Aleksandrowicz-Trzcińska M, Drozdowski S, Jakubowski P (2012) Growth of mycorrhized and non-mycorrhized Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) seedlings on substrates varying in moisture content and fertility. Sylwan 156:100-111. [In Polish with English abstract]

Castellano MA (1996) Outplanting performance of mycorrhizal inoculated seedlings. In: Concepts in mycorrhizal research (Mukerji KG, ed.), pp 223-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1124-1_9

Chlepko V, Tomková E, Krajňáková J (1991) Contribution to autovegetative propagation of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) from polluted regions. Scientific works of Forest Research Institute Zvolen, Príroda Bratislava, pp 15-27. [in Slovak with English summary]

Corrêa A, Strasser RJ, Martins-Loução MA (2006) Are mycorrhiza always beneficial? Plant and Soil 279:65-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-7460-1

Ditmarová Ľ, Kurjak D, Palmroth S, Kmeť J, Střelcová K (2010) Physiological responses of Norway spruce (Picea abies) seedlings to drought stress. Tree Physiology 30:205-213. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpp116

Dumroese RK, Landis TD, Pinto JR, Haase DL, Wilkinson KW, Davis AS (2016) Meeting forest restoration challenges: Using the Target Plant Concept. Reforesta 1:37-52. https://doi.org/10.21750/REFOR.1.03.3

ÄŽurkoviÄ J, MiÅ¡alová A (2008) Micropropagation of temperate noble hardwoods: an overview. Functional Plant Science and Biotechnology 2:1-19.

Enebak SA, Carey WA (2004) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria may reduce fusiform rust infection in nursery-grown loblolly pine seedlings. South J Appl For 28:185-188.

FinÄo S, Maľová M (2009) The damages caused by ruminant game or what is their development in the forests of Slovakia in the years 1995−2008? Les a Letokruhy 11−12:33-34. [in Slovak]

FinÄo S, Petráš R (2007) Ecological fundamentals of forest protection against damage by game. National Forest Centre Zvolen. [in Slovak]

Gömöry D, Foffová E, Kmeť J, Longauer R, Romšáková I (2010) Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) provenance variation in autumn cold hardiness: Adaptation or acclimation. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia Series Botanica 52:42-49. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10182-010-0022-8

González-Ochoa AI, Heras J, Torres P, Sánchez-Gómez E (2003) Mycorrhization of Pinus halepensis Mill. and Pinus pinaster Aiton seedlings in two commercial nurseries. Ann Forest Sci 60:43-48. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2002072

Grék J, Brutovský D, FinÄo S, HanÄinský L, HeÅ¡ko J, IÅ¡toňa J, Konôpka J, Maňkovská B, Paulenka J, PiovarÄi J, Å tefanÄík L, Toma R, Tužinský L, Zajac H (1991) The principles of forest management in Slovakian forests affected by emissions. Príroda, Bratislava. [in Slovak]

Grossnickle SC (2016) Restoration Silviculture: An ecophysiological perspective – Lessons learned across 40 years. Reforesta 1:1-36. https://doi.org/10.21750/REFOR.1.02.2

Gubka K (2001) Natural and artificial regeneration in protective forests in the Low Tatra Mts. In: Actual problems of silviculture in mountain forests (SlodiÄák M, Novák J (eds.)). Research Institute of Forestry and Wildlife, Strnady, pp 221-230. [in Slovak with English summary]

HanÄinský L (1972) Forest types of Slovakia. Príroda Bratislava. [in Slovak]

Holuša J, Pešková V, Vostrá L, Pernek M (2009) Impact of mycorrhizal inoculation on spruce seedling: comparisons of a 5-year experiment in forests in infested by honey fungus. Period Biol 111:413-417.

Ivetić V, Devetaković J (2016) Reforestation challenges in Southeast Europe facing climate change. Reforesta 1:178-220. https://doi.org/10.21750/10.21750/REFOR.1.10.10

Jamnická G, Ditmarová Ľ, Kurjak D, Kmeť J, Pšidová E, Macková M, Gömöry D, Střelcová K (2013) The soil hydrogel improved photosynthetic performance of beech seedlings treated under drought. Plant Soil Environ 59:446-451.

Jurásek A, Leugner J, Martincová J (2010) Growth and physiological state of beech seedlings grown in a nursery in different light conditions. Journal of Forest Science 56:442-450.

Jurásek A, Martincová J, Nárovcová J (2004) Problems of the use of forest tree containerized planting stock nursery grown by intensive technologies in the Czech Republic. In: Possible applications of planting stock of intensive nursery technologies for reforestation (Jurásek A (ed.)). Research Institute of Forestry and Wildlife, Research Station OpoÄno, pp 8-15. [in Czech with English abstract]

Jurásek A, Nárovcová J, Nárovec V (2006) Guide of containerized planting stock of forest trees. Lesnická práce. [in Czech]

JurÄo M (1995) Restoration in the High Tatra Mts. Tatry 34(4):4-5. [in Slovak]

Kantor J (1975) Forest restoration and forest tree breeding. Státní zemědělské nakladatelství Praha. [in Czech]

KarliÄić V, Golubović Ćurguz V, RaiÄević V (2016) The alleviation of reforestation challenges by beneficial soil microorganisms. Reforesta 1:238-260. https://doi.org/10.21750/refor.1.12.12

Kavuljak A (1942) The history of forestry and timber industry in Slovakia. Lesnícka a drevárska ústredňa, Bratislava. [in Slovak]

Kozlowski TT, Pallardy SG (2002) Acclimation and Adaptive Responses of Woody Plants to Environmental Stresses. The Botanical Review 68(2):270-334. https://doi.org/10.1663/0006-8101(2002)068[0270:AAAROW]2.0.CO;2

Kuneš I, Baláš M, Millerová K, Balcar V (2011) Introducing of broad-leaved and fir admixture into coniferous stands in the Jizera Mts. Lesnický průvodce 9/2011. Research Institute of Forestry and Wildlife, Strnady. [in Czech with English summary]

Leugner J, Jurásek A, Martincová J (2009) Comparison of morphological and physiological parameters of the planting material of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) from intensive nursery technologies with current bareroot plants. Journal of Forest Science 55:511-517.

Leugner J, Jurásek A, Martincová J (2011) The assessment of growth and health of clone mixture of Norway spruce in 2nd generation clone plantations in comparison with common planting stock. In: Stabilization of forest functions in anthropically disturbed and changing environmental conditions (Kacálek D et al. (eds.)). Research Institute of Forestry and Wildlife, Research Station OpoÄno, pp 91-98. [in Czech with English abstract]

Lindstrom A, Stattin E, Gräns D, Wallin E (2014) Storability measures of Norway spruce and Scots pine seedlings and assessment of post-storage vitality by measuring shoot electrolyte leakage. Scand J Forest Res 29(8):717-724. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2014.977340

Luoranen J, Riikonen J, Rikala R, Sutinen S (2012) Frost hardiness, carbohydrates and bud morphology of Picea abies seedlings after different lengths of freezer storage. Scand J Forest Res 27(5):414-419. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2012.666566

Maľová M, Longauerová V (2012) Alternative ways to combat unwanted vegetation. In: Actual problems in forest protection in 2012 (Kunca A (ed.)), National Forest Center Zvolen, pp 65-70. [in Slovak]

Marhefka J (2014) Restoration of damaged area. Tatry 53(6) Special edition:32-34. [in Slovak]

Marx DH (1991) The practical significance of ectomycorrhizae in forest establishment. In: Ecophysiology of ectomycorrhizae of forest trees (Hägglund B (ed.)). The Marcus Wallenberg foundation symposia proceedings. Sweden, pp 54-90.

Mattsson A (2016) Reforestation challenges in Scandinavia. Reforesta 1:67-85. https://doi.org/10.21750/REFOR.1.05.5

Mauer O (2007) Possibilities of protection of plantations in dry periods In: Actual problems in seed management, nursery management and reforestation (Sarvaš M, Sušková M (eds.)). National Forest Center Zvolen, pp 145-149. [in Czech]

Mauer O, Palátová E, Rychnovská A (2005) Artificial forest regeneration by sowing − Sowing into growing cells. In: Actual problems of silviculture (Saniga M, Jaloviar P (eds.)). Technical University in Zvolen, pp 39-44. [in Czech with English abstract]

McKay HM, Jinks RL, McEvoy C (1999) The effect of desiccation and rough-handling on the survival and early growth of ash, beech, birch and oak seedlings. Ann Forest Sci 56(5):391-402. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:19990504

MPSR (2016) Green Report 2016: Report on the status of forestry in the SR 2015. Ministry of Agriculture of the Slovak Republic in cooperation with the National Forest Centre – Forest Research Institute Zvolen.

Parobeková Z, Sedmáková D, Kucbel S, Pittner J, Jaloviar P, Saniga M, Balanda M, Vencurik J (2016) Influence of disturbances and climate on high-mountain Norway spruce forests in the Low Tatra Mts., Slovakia. Forest Ecol Manag 380:128-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.08.031

Paule L (1992) Genetics and breeding of forest trees. Príroda Bratislava. [in Slovak]

Pennanen T, Heiskanen J, Korkama T (2005) Dynamics of ectomycorrhizal fungi and growth of Norway spruce seedlings after planting on a mounded forest clearcut. Forest Ecol Manag 213:243-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.03.044

Pešková V, Tuma M (2010) Influence of artificial mycorrhization on development of spruce seedlings at Jablunkov (forest district). Zprávy lesnického výzkumu 55:211-220. [in Czech with English summary]

Pittner J (2012) Structural diversity analysis as a criterion for evaluation of ecological stability of Norway spruce natural forest in Nefcerka. In: Silviculture in central Europe (Saniga M et al. (eds.)). Technical University in Zvolen, pp 86-96. [in Slovak with English abstract]

Pšidová E, Ditmarová Ľ, Jamnická G, Kurjak D, Majerová J, Czajkowski T, Bolte A (2015) Photosynthetic response of beech seedlings of different origin to water deficit. Photosynthetica 53:187−194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-015-0101-x

RepÃ¡Ä I (1996a) Effects of forest litter on mycorrhiza formation and growth of container grown Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) seedlings. Lesnictví 42:317-324.

RepÃ¡Ä I (1996b) Inoculation of Picea abies (L.) Karst. seedlings with vegetative inocula of ectomycorrhizal fungi Suillus bovinus (L.:Fr.) O. Kuntze and Inocybe lacera (Fr.) Kumm. New Forests 12:41-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00029981

RepÃ¡Ä I (2003) Production of mycorrhized Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) seedlings. Acta Facultatis Rerum Naturalium, Universitas Ostraviensis. Biol Ecol 9:125-131. [in Slovak with English summary]

RepÃ¡Ä I (2006) Shoot pattern of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) container-grown rooted cuttings inoculated with symbiotic fungi. In: Stabilisation of forest functions in biotopes disturbed by anthropogenic activity (Jurásek A et al. (eds.)). Research Institute of Forestry and Wildlife, Research Station OpoÄno, pp 145-156.

RepÃ¡Ä I (2007) Ectomycorrhiza formation and growth of Picea abies seedlings inoculated with alginate-bead fungal inoculum in peat and bark compost substrates. Forestry 80:517-530. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpm036

RepÃ¡Ä I (2008) Forest restoration. Technical University in Zvolen. [in Slovak]

RepÃ¡Ä I (2011) Ectomycorrhizal inoculum and inoculation techniques. In: Diversity and biotechnology of ectomycorrhizae (Rai M, Varma A (eds.)). Soil Biology 25, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 43-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15196-5_3

RepÃ¡Ä I (2015) Contribution to the knowledge of the influence of planting time on the survival and growth of forest plantations. In: Current problems in the forest establishment and silviculture (Å tefanÄík I, Bednárová D (eds.)). National Forest Center Zvolen, pp 28-35. [in Slovak]

RepÃ¡Ä I, Balanda M, Vencurik J, KmeÅ¥ J, Krajmerová D, Paule L (2014) Effects of substrate and ectomycorrhizal inoculation on the development of two-years-old container-grown Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) seedlings. iForest 8:487-496. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1291-007

RepÃ¡Ä I, KmeÅ¥ J, Vencurik J, Balanda M (2013b) Effects of commercial products application on survival, growth and physiological parameters of Norway spruce and European beech. Zprávy lesnického výzkumu 58:167-175. [in Slovak with English summary]

RepÃ¡Ä I, Sendecký M, Parobeková Z (2016) Effects of hydrogels and planting time on Norway spruce and Scots pine plantations development on planting site in the Strážovské vrchy. Mts. In: Forest functions in changing environments (Kacálek D et al. (eds.)). Research Institute of Forestry and Wildlife, Strnady, pp 37-42. [in Slovak with English abstract]

RepÃ¡Ä I, TuÄeková A, SarvaÅ¡ová I, Vencurik J (2011b) Survival and growth of outplanted seedlings of selected tree species on the High Tatra Mts. windthrow area after the first growing season. Journal of Forest Science 57:349-358.

RepÃ¡Ä I, Vencurik J (2015) Intensification of forest plantations establishment with emphasis on application of stimulative additives. Scientific monograph. Technical University in Zvolen. [in Slovak with English summary]

RepÃ¡Ä I, Vencurik J, Balanda M (2011a) Testing of microbial additives in the rooting of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) stem cuttings. Journal of Forest Science 57:555-564.

RepÃ¡Ä I, Vencurik J, Balanda M (2013a) The use of beneficial microorganisms in forest planting stock production. Scientific monograph. Technical University in Zvolen. [in Slovak with English summary]

Rydval M, Wilson R (2012) The impact of industrial SO2 pollution on north Bohemia conifers. Water Air Soil Pollut 223:5727-5744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-012-1310-6

Sarvaš M (2004) Changes in cold hardiness of silver fir and larch bare-rooted seedlings during autumn and spring. Journal of Forest Science 50:237-242.

SarvaÅ¡ M, Lengyelová A, TakáÄová E (2005) The effect of different photoperiod on growth of containerized (Lännen-Plantek) spruce seedlings. In: Actual problems of silviculture (Saniga M, Jaloviar P (eds.)). Technical University in Zvolen, pp 138-141. [in Slovak]

SarvaÅ¡ M, TuÄeková A, TakáÄová E, Chválová K, Lengyelová K, Varínsky J, Longauerová V, Å uÅ¡ková M (2007) Forest restoration in changing environmental conditions. National Forest Center Zvolen. [in Slovak]

Sarvašová I, Ferencová I (2009) The evaluation of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) adaptability and survival on the experimental plot Dúbravica – Lešť. Acta Facultatis Forestalis 51:39-48. [in Slovak with English summary]

Schütz JP, Götz M, Schmid W, Mandallaz D (2006) Vulnerability of spruce (Picea abies) and beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest stands to storms and consequences for silviculture. Eur J Forest Res 125:291-302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-006-0111-0

Slávik M (2005) Production of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) seedlings on substrate mixes using growth stimulants. Journal of Forest Science 51:14-21.

Slovak Forests (2013) Annual Report 2013. Forests of Slovak Republic, National enterprise, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia. [In Slovak]

Šmelková Ľ (2004) The germination stimulation of long term stored conifer seeds. In: Current problems of forest nurseries and seed production. (Sušková M, Sarvaš M (eds.)). Forest Research Institute Zvolen, CD ROM. [In Slovak]

Šmelková Ľ, Tichá I (2003) Comparison of quantitative and qualitative parameters of European larch (Larix decidua Mill.) seedlings grown by bare-root and container technologies. Acta Facultatis Forestalis Zvolen 45:135-149. [in Slovak with English summary]

Sutton R (1980) Evaluation of stock after planting. NZ J Forestry Sci 10:297-299.

TakáÄová E, SarvaÅ¡ M, Lengyelová A (2007) Research of hydroabsorbent utilization during cultivation bare-root planting stock of spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.). In: Management of forests in changing environmental conditions (Saniga M et al. (eds.)). Technical University in Zvolen, pp 11-16. [in Slovak with English abstract]

Tóthová S (2007) The application of wood ash in soil and its effect on soil chemistry and nutrition of trees. PhD. thesis, Technical University in Zvolen. [in Slovak]

TuÄeková A (1999) Afforestation of emission clearings of magnesite type. In: Silviculture in terms of anthropically changed environment (Kantor P (ed.)). Mendel University in Brno, pp 151-157. [in Slovak]

TuÄeková A (2004a) Elimination of the effect of extreme weather in reforestation via utilization of water-retaining and biotechnological (fertilizing) preparations. In: Main assignments of silviculture at the beginning of 21st century (Peňáz J, Martinek J (eds.)). Mendel University in Brno, pp 101-119. [in Slovak with English summary]

TuÄeková A (2004b) Results of reforestation air-polluted clearings by con-containerised and containerised plants. Lesnícky Äasopis − Forestry Journal 50(1):17-39. [in Slovak with English summary]

TuÄeková A (2007) Soil conditioners in the nursery technology. In: Management of forests in changing environmental conditions (Saniga M et al. (eds.)). Technical Univerzity in Zvolen, pp 56-65. [in Slovak with English abstract]

TuÄeková A (2011) Unconventional progressive techniques of reforestation after disasters of great magnitude. Lesnícke listy pre prax 5/2011, National Forest Center Zvolen. [in Slovak]

TuÄeková A (2013a) Afforestation in biogroups on calamity clearings in the Low Tatras area. In: Silviculture in central Europe (Baláš M et al. (eds.)). Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, pp 299-308. [in Slovak with English abstract]

TuÄeková A (2013b) Current problems of adaptation of containerized spruce seedlings on disaster clearings. In: Current problems in the forest establishment and silviculture (Bednárová D (ed.)). National Forest Center, Zvolen, pp 56-67. [in Slovak]

Vakula J, Zúbrik M, Kunca A, Dubec M, FiňÄo S, Galko J, Gubka A, KaÅ¡tier P, Konôpka B, Konôpka J, LalkoviÄ M, LeontovyÄ R, Longauerová V, Maľová M, Nikolov C, Pavlendová P, Rell S, Úradník M (2012) New methods of forest protection. National Forest Center Zvolen. [in Slovak]

Van Labeke MC, Volckaert E (2010) Evaluation of electrolyte leakage for detecting cold acclimatization in six deciduous tree species. Acta Horticulturae 885:403-410. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2010.885.56

Vencurik J (2016) Instructions for practices from the history of forestry in Slovakia. Technical University in Zvolen. [in Slovak]

Zachar D, ÄŒermák V, Intribus R, Charvát K, LeontovyÄ R, Midriak R, TranÄík P (1969) Research of degraded soils in locality Periská and their afforestation. Lesnícke Å¡túdie 2, Forest Research Institute Zvolen, Príroda Bratislava. [in Slovak with English summary]

Zachar D, Intribus R, Midriak R, Slivka J (1973) Research of degraded soils in the Slovak Karst and their afforestation. Lesnícke štúdie 16, Forest Research Institute Zvolen, Príroda Bratislava. [in Slovak with English summary]

Published
2017-07-01
Section
Review articles