Using double-sampling techniques to reduce the number of measurement trees during forest inventories
AbstractVariable-radius sampling techniques are commonly used during forest inventories. For each sample tree at a particular sampling point, diameter and height(s) are measured and then weight is estimated using established equations.Â Heights can require a fair amount of time to measure in the field.Â Separating the weight per acre estimate into two components; average basal area per acre and WBAR (individual tree weight-basal area ratio) across all points, can often lead to more efficient sampling schemes. Variable-radius sampling allows for a quick estimate of basal area per acre at a point since no individual tree measurements are needed.Â If there is a strong relationship between weight and basal area, then by knowing basal area you essentially know weight.Â Separation into two components is advantageous because in most cases there is more variability among basal area estimates per point then there is in WBAR. Hence, you can spend more resources establishing many points that only estimate basal area â€“ often called â€œCountâ€ points. â€œFullâ€ points are those where individual tree measurements are also conducted. There is little published information quantifying the impacts on basal area, weight, etc., estimates among different â€œFull/Countâ€ sample size ratios at the same site. Inventories were examined to determine this methodâ€™s applicability to loblolly pine plantations in southern Arkansas and northern Louisiana. Results show there is more variability among basal area estimates than WBAR and that the amount of trees being â€œintensivelyâ€ measured is excessive.Â Based on these four plantations, a â€œFullâ€ point could be installed ranging from every other point to every fifth point depending on site conditions and the desired variable.
Avery TE, Burkhart HE (2002) Forest measurements. McGraw Hill. New York. 456 pp.
Bell JF, Alexander LB (1957) Application of the variable plot method of sampling forest stands. Oregon Board of Forestry, Salem, Ore. Res. Note 30. 26 pp.
Coble DW, Grogan J (2007) Comparison of systematic line-point and double sampling designs for pine and hardwood forests in the Western Gulf. South. J. Appl. For. 31:199â€“206.
Cochran WG (1960) Sampling Techniques. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York. 330 pp.
Oderwald RG, Jones E (1992) Sample sizes for point, double sampling. Can. J. For. Res. 22:980-983. https://doi.org/10.1139/x92-131
Shiver BD, Borders BE (1996) Sampling techniques for forest resource inventory. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York. 356 pp.
Copyright (c) 2017 Curtis L VanderSchaaf, Gordon Holley, Joshua Adams
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under aÂ Creative Commons Attribution LicenseÂ CCBYÂ that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (SeeÂ The Effect of Open Access).