No. 5 (2018)
Published: 10.07.2018.
Authors in this issue:
University of Belgrade - Faculty of Forestry, Abdenour Kheloufi, Boutheina Ababsa, David B. South, Dragica Vilotić, Ivan Denić, Ivona Kerkez, Jovana Devetaković, Jovana R Devetaković, Lahouaria Mansouri, Marina Nonić, Meriem Sahnoune, Mirjana Šijačić-Nikolić, Nada Aziz, Nebojša Todorović, Sarra Boukemiche, Vladan Ivetić,
Author guidelines
Editorial Policy
21
Issues147
ArticlesBecome Reviewer
There are great benefits to becoming a reviewer.
Article submission
The journal Reforesta is published annually, available in both print and electronic formats.
Archive
See all
Issue 21, 2026
Issue 20, 2025
Issue 19, 2025
Issue 18, 2024
01.12.2017.
Research paper
APPENDIX 1 -VARIABILITY OF BEECH CUPULES IN SERBIA
University of Belgrade - Faculty of Forestry, Vladan Ivetić, Ivona Kerkez, University of Belgrade - Faculty of Forestry, Ivan Denić, University of Belgrade - Faculty of Forestry, Jovana Devetaković, University of Belgrade - Faculty of Forestry
01.12.2017.
Letter to the Editor
Reforestation challenges 2018
The conference on "Reforestation Challenges" took place on 20-22 June 2018 in Belgrade, Serbia, at Faculty of Forestry of the University of Belgrade. This was the fourth meeting on reforestation challenges, after three successful meetings in three previous years (2015 – Belgrade, Serbia; 2016 – Krakow, Poland; 2017 – Session at the IUFRO Congress in Freiburg, Germany). This Conference, like the first one, was organized by Faculty of Forestry of the University of Belgrade, IUFRO (specifically by IUFRO Unit: 3.02.00 - Stand Establishment and Treatment), and Reforesta Scientific and professional Society.
Vladan Ivetić
01.12.2017.
Research paper
Breaking seed coat dormancy of six tree species
Abdenour Kheloufi, Lahouaria Mansouri, Nada Aziz, Meriem Sahnoune, Sarra Boukemiche, Boutheina Ababsa
01.12.2017.
Research paper
The effect of half-sib lines on morphological attributes of one-year old Fraxinus angustifolia seedlings
Ivona Kerkez, Marina Nonić, Jovana Devetaković, Mirjana Šijačić-Nikolić, Vladan Ivetić
01.12.2017.
Research paper
European white elm biomass production (Ulmus laevis Pall.) in high-density plantation
Jovana R Devetaković, Nebojša Todorović, Dragica Vilotić, Vladan Ivetić
01.12.2017.
Research paper
Variability of beech cupules in Serbia
Vladan Ivetić, Ivona Kerkez, Ivan Denić, Jovana Devetaković
01.12.2017.
Review paper
Cost of inoculating seedlings with Pisolithus tinctorius spores
Although the production of commercial products of vegetative Pt (Pisolithus tinctorius (Pers.) Coker & Couch) inoculums has ceased in North America due to a lack of demand by consumers, the number of products that contain Pt spores has increased. The quality, quantity and price of these products vary considerably. The cost of inoculating 1,000 tree seedlings with Pt basidiospores can vary from $0.45 to more than $30. The cost of treating with Pt spores is lowest when seedlings are inoculated in a container nursery using rates that are less than 0.4 mg per seedling. However, with some products the cost to treat 1,000 bareroot seedlings is greater than $500 when spores are applied in the planting hole. Three decades ago, 1 g of Pt spores could be purchased for $0.13 and now the price of 1 g can exceed $14. Although many research papers provide data on the biological response to inoculating seedlings with spores, few document the cost of inoculation. Commercial products that are marketed toward homeowners containing both ectomycorrhizal and endomycorrhizal spores are more expensive than products that contain only ectomycorrhizal spores. In situations where survival and growth of seedlings are not increased, the benefit/cost ratio will typically be less than one.
David B. South
01.12.2017.
Review paper
Fertilizer trials for bareroot nurseries in North America
In North America, most tree nursery nutrition publications during the past two decades involved either container-grown stock or stock grown in greenhouses. In contrast, most bareroot nursery fertility trials in North America were published during the last century. As a result, some bareroot fertilization recommendations have remained the same since 1980 and some practices continue to be based on myths and assumptions. The bareroot nursery industry in the USA might benefit if the next generation of graduate students will consider testing old and new theories about nursery fertilization. Hopefully, they will discover new facts so that future fertilization regimes will be based on science. This paper provides various fertilizer trials that should be established in bareroot nurseries.
David B. South