More articles from Issue 13, 2022
Growth performances of seed sources in a progeny trial of Pinus brutia Ten.
Use of magnesium in bareroot pine nurseries
Citations
1
Yunus Eser
(2024)
Kızılçam (Pinus brutia Ten.) ve Toros Sediri (Cedrus libani A. Rich.) ağaçlandırma sahalarının büyüme performansı: Isparta Yöresi örneği
Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(2)
10.17474/artvinofd.1504704Growth performances of seed sources in a progeny trial of Pinus brutia Ten.
,
Nebi Bilir
Alper Ahmet Ozbey
Abstract
References
Atalay, I., Sezer, I., & Cukur, H. (1998). Ecological Characteristics of Forests and Seed Transfer Regions in Pinus brutia Ten.
Bilir, N., Kang, K.-S., Zang, D., & Lindgren, D. (2004). Fertility Variation and Status Number Between a Base Population and a Seed Orchard of Pinus brutia. Silvae Genetica, 53(1–6), 161–163. https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2004-0029
Cercioglu, M., & Bilir, N. (n.d.). Seed Source Effect on Quality and Morphology of Turkish Red Pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) Seedlings. REFORESTA, 2, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.21750/REFOR.2.01.16
Çetinkaya, D., & Bilir, N. (n.d.). Effect of using harvesting residues as a nursery media on seedling weight in Brutian pine (Pinus brutia Ten.). REFORESTA, 9, 37–43. https://doi.org/10.21750/REFOR.9.05.79
Dilaver, M. (2015). Seedling quality and morphology in seed sources and seedling type of Brutian pine (Pinus brutia Ten.). World Journal of Agricultural Research, 3, 83–85.
Citation
Copyright

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Article metrics
Google scholar:
See link
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.