Application of a PhotoThermal model for container-grown conifer seedling production

Authors

  • Steven Grossnickle NurseryToForest Solutions

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21750/REFOR.8.01.71

Abstract

This study applied a total energy approach to model seedling growth for container-grown loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Seedlings were grown in three container stocktypes representing a range of cavity volume and density patterns. These seedlings were grown under both controlled greenhouse and outside compound environmental conditions under well-defined cultural conditions. Models for temperature and light ranges were created from work on the ecophysiological performance and morphological development of loblolly pine to these atmospheric conditions. A PhotoThermal data set was created by generating hourly averages of these two environmental variables during the growing season. Light and temperature data were integrated, each weighted equally, into PhotoThermal hours (PTH) to assess the crop growth response. Loblolly pine seedling growth in both the greenhouse and outside compound was directly related to PTH. Seedling growth was also related to the container type with the largest cavity volume and lowest cavity density having the greatest growth per PTH. Application of the PhotoThermal model is discussed for growing seedlings in an operational program having multiple production steps, delivery dates and nursery locations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Steven Grossnickle, NurseryToForest Solutions

    Steve has conducted work in the plant sciences/forestry field for over thirty years within university and industry programs throughout the U.S. and Canada, regarding ecological and physiological processes of plants in operational nurseries and forested areas. These research programs focused on areas of genetic diversity, and the performance and development of plants in relation to nursery practices, silvicultural operations and ecosystem restoration. Steve has collaborated with the nursery industry, both forestry and horticulture, and the forest industry to address operational issues.

    Steve has earned an international reputation as a scientist and practitioner addressing basic biological and ecological processes of plants within research, extension and educational programs. These programs were conducted with external partners in universities, government, and the nursery and forest industries. Steve has published a book (Titled: Ecophysiology of Northern Spruce Species: The Performance of Planted Seedlings), 69 refereed scientific journal papers and chapters, 26 technical transfer papers and 4 patents. Steve holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Forest Resource Management from Southern Illinois University, and a Master of Science degree and a Doctor of Philosophy degree from Colorado State University in Plant Physiological Ecology.

References

Aghai MM, Pinto JR, Davis AS (2014) Container volume and growing density influence western larch (Larix occidentalis Nutt.) seedling development during nursery culture and establishment. New For 45:199-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-013-9402-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-013-9402-8

Angus JF, Mackenzie DH, Morton R, Schafer CA (1981) Phasic development in field crops II. Thermal and photoperiodic responses of spring wheat. Field Crops Res 4:269-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(81)90078-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(81)90078-2

Aphalo PJ, Ballare CL (1995) On the importance of information-acquiring systems in plant–plant interactions. Funct Ecol 9:5-14. https://doi.org/10.2307/2390084 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2390084

Aphalo P, Rikala R (2003) Field performance of silver-birch planting-stock grown at different spacing and in containers of different volume. New For 25:93-108.

https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022618810937 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022618810937

Armitage AM, Wetzstein HY (1984) Influence of light intensity on flower initiation and differentiation in hybrid geranium [Pelargonium X hortorum, irradiance]. HortSci 9:114-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.19.1.114

Armson KA, Sadreika V (1979) Forest tree nursery soil management and related practices. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Toronto, ON.

Barnett JP, Brissette JC (1986) Producing southern pine seedlings in containers. USDA forest service general technical report SO-59, p 71. https://doi.org/10.2737/SO-GTR-59 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2737/SO-GTR-59

Barney CW (1951) Effects of soil temperature and light intensity on root growth of loblolly pine seedlings. Plant Physiol 26:146-163. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.26.1.146 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.26.1.146

Boswell VR (1929) Factors influencing yield and quality of peas. Maryland Agric. Exp. Sta. Bul. 306.

Denchev P, Grossnickle SC (2019) Somatic embryogenesis for conifer seedling production. Reforesta 7:109-137. https://doi.org/10.21750/REFOR.7.08.70 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21750/REFOR.7.08.70

Dole JM, Gibson JL (eds) (2006) Cutting propagation: A guide to propagating and producing floriculture crops. Ball Publishing, Batavia IL.

Faust JE, Holcombe V, Rajapakse NG, Layne DR (2005) The effect of daily light integral on bedding plant growth and flowering. HortSci 41:114-119. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.40.3.645 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.40.3.645

Graper DF, Healy W (1991) High pressure sodium irradiation and infrared radiation accelerate Petunia seedling growth. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 116:435-438. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.116.3.435 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.116.3.435

Grossnickle SC (2000) Ecophysiology of northern spruce species: the performance of planted seedlings. NRC Research Press, Ottawa.

Grossnickle SC, Russell JH (1991) Gas exchange processes of yellow-cedar (Chamaecyparis nootkatensis) in response to environmental variables. Can J Bot 69:2684-2691. https://doi.org/10.1139/b91-337 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/b91-337

Grossnickle SC, Cyr D, Polonenko DR (1996) Somatic embryogenesis tissue culture for the propagation of conifer seedlings: a technology comes of age. Tree Planters’ Notes 47:48-57.

Hammer GL, Goyne PJ, Woodruff DR (1982) Phenology of sunflower cultivars. III. Models for prediction in field environments. Aust J Agric Res 33:263-274. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9820263 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9820263

Hodgson TJ (1985) Heat unit summation theory in commercial nursery management. In: South DB (ed) Proceedings, International symposium on nursery management practices for the southern pines. Auburn, AL: Auburn Univ. pp. 64-71.

Hodgson TJ (2015) The Use of Remote Monitoring and Growing Degree Days for Growing Container Seedlings. Tree Planters’ Notes 58:78-80.

Hocking D, Mitchell DL (1975) The Influences of Rooting Volume–Seedling Escapement and Substratum Density on Greenhouse Growth of Lodgepole Pine, White Spruce, and Douglas Fir Grown in Extruded Peat Cylinders. Can J For Res 5:440-451. https://doi.org/10.1139/x75-061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/x75-061

Hsiao TC (1973) Plant response to water stress. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 24:519-570. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.24.060173.002511 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.24.060173.002511

Islam MS, Morison JIL (1992) Influence of solar radiation and temperature on irrigated rice grain yield in Bangladesh. Field Crops Res 30:13-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(92)90053-C DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(92)90053-C

Jinks R, Mason B (1998) Effects of seedling density on the growth of Corsican pine (Pinus nigra var. maritima Melv.), Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii Franco) in containers. Ann For Sci 55:407-423. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:19980402 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:19980402

Korczynski PC, Logan J, Faust JE (2002) Mapping monthly distribution of daily light integrals across the contiguous United States. HortTech 12:12-16. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.12.1.12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.12.1.12

Kozlowski TT (1949) Light and water in relation to growth and competition of Piedmont forest tree species. Ecol Mono 19:207-231. https://doi.org/10.2307/1943536 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1943536

Kozlowski TT (1982) Water supply and tree growth. Part I. Water deficits. For Abstr 43:57-95.

Kozlowski TT, Kramer PJ, Pallardy SG (1991) The physiological ecology of woody plants. Academic Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-424160-2.50005-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-424160-2.50005-7

Kramer PJ (1957) Some effects of various combinations of day and night temperatures and photoperiod on the height growth of loblolly pine seedlings. For Sci 3:45-55.

Kramer PJ, Decker JP (1944) Relation between light intensity and rate of photosynthesis of loblolly pine and certain hardwoods. Plant Physiol 19:350-358. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.19.2.350 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.19.2.350

Larcher W (1995) Physiological plant ecology: Ecophysiology and stress physiology of functional groups. 3rd Edition, Springer, Berlin.

Lassoie JP, Hinckley TM, Grier CC (1985) Coniferous forests of the Pacific Northwest. In: Chabot BF, Mooney HA (eds) Physiological ecology of North American plant communities. Chapman and Hall, NY, pp. 127-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4830-3_6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4830-3_6

Ledig FT, Perry TO (1969) Net assimilation rate and growth in loblolly pine seedlings. Forest Sci 15:431-438.

Lee C (2011) Corn growth stages and growing degree days: a quick reference guide. AGR 202. Lexington, KY: Cooperative Extension Service, University of Kentucky, College of Agriculture. http://www2.ca.uky.edu/agc/pubs/agr/agr202/agr202.pdf.

Li X, Guo T, Mu Q, Li X, Yu J (2018) Genomic and environmental determinants and their interplay underlying phenotypic plasticity. PNAS, 115:6679-6684.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1718326115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1718326115

Liu B, Heins RD (1997) Modeling poinsettia vegetative growth and development: The response to the ratio of radiant to thermal energy. II Modelling Plant Growth, Environmental Control and Farm Management in Protected Cultivation 456, pp.133-142.

https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1998.456.15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1998.456.15

Liu B, Heins RD (2002) PhotoThermal Ratio Affects Plant Quality in: Freedom Poinsettia. J Am Soc Hort Sci 127: 20-26. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.127.1.20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.127.1.20

Madarmga FJ, Knott JE, (1951) Temperature summations in relation to lettuce growth Proc Am Soc Hort Sci 58:147-152.

Magoon CA, Culpepper CW (1932) Response of sweet corn to varying temperatures from time of planting to canning maturity. USDA Tech Bull 312.

Major JE, Grossnickle SC, Arnott JT (1994) Influence of dormancy induction treatments on the photosynthetic response of field planted western hemlock seedlings. For Ecol Manage 63:235-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(94)90113-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(94)90113-9

Masle J, Doussinault G, Farquhar GD, Sun B (1989) Foliar stage in wheat correlates better to PhotoThermal time than to thermal time. Plant Cell Environ 12:235-247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1989.tb01938.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1989.tb01938.x

Mexal JG, Fisher JT (1984) Pruning loblolly pine seedlings. In: Proc. South. Nur. Conf. USDA For Ser, Southern Reg, Atlanta, Georgia. pp. 75-83.

Mexal JG, Landis TD (1990) Target seedling concepts: height and diameter. In: Rose R et al. (eds) Target seedling symposium: Proceedings of the combined meeting of western forest nursery association. USDA forest service general technical report RM-200, pp. 17-36.

Miller P, Lanier W, Brandt S (2001) Using growing degree days to predict plant stages. MT2001103 AG. Missoula, MT: Montana State University Extension Service. 8 p

Moccaldi LA; Runkle ES (2007) Modeling the Effects of Temperature and Photosynthetic Daily Light Integral on Growth and Flowering of Salvia splendens and Tagetes patula. J. Amer Hort Soc 132:283-288. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.132.3.283 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.132.3.283

Niu G, Heins RD, Cameron AC, Carlson WH (2001) Temperature and daily light integral influence plant quality and flower development of Campanula carpatica ‘Blue Clips’, ‘Deep Blue Clips’, and Campanula ‘Birch Hybrid’. HortSci 36:664-668. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.36.4.664 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.36.4.664

Nix HA (1976) Climate and crop productivity in Australia. Climate and rice. IRRI, Los Baños, The Philippines, 495-507.

Oh W, Cheon IH, Kim KS, Runkle ES (2009) Photosynthetic Daily Light Integral Influences Flowering Time and Crop Characteristics of Cyclamen persicum. HortSci 44:341-344.

https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.44.2.341 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.44.2.341

Pallardy SG (2008) Physiology of Woody Plants, 3rd edition. Academic Press, New York.

Perry KB, Wehner TC, Johnson GL (1986) Comparison of 14 methods to determine heat unit requirements for cucumber harvest. HortSci 21:419-423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.21.3.419

Pramuk LA, Runkle ES (2005) Photosynthetic daily light integral during the seedling stage influences subsequent growth and flowering of Celosia, Impatiens, Salvia, Tagetes, and Viola. HortSci 40:1336-1339. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.40.5.1336 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.40.5.1336

Robertson GW (1968) A biometeorological time scale for a cereal crop involving day and night temperatures and photoperiod. Int J Biometeorol 12:191-223.

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01553422 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01553422

Shirley HL (1929) The influence of light intensity and light quality upon the growth of plants. Amer Jour Bot 16:354-390. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1929.tb09488.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1929.tb09488.x

Simpson DG (1991) Growing density and container volume affect nursery and field growth of interior spruce seedlings. North J Appl For 8:160-165. https://doi.org/10.1093/njaf/8.4.160 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/njaf/8.4.160

Simpson DG (1994) Nursery growing density and container volume affect nursery and field growth of Douglas-fir and lodgepole pine seedlings. USDA forest service general technical report RM-257, pp. 104-114.

Sutton BC, Attree SM, El-Kassabi YA, Grossnikle SC, Polonenko DR (2004) Commercialization of somatic embryogenesis for plantation forestry. In: Walter C, Carson M (eds) Plantation forest biotechnology for the 21st century. Research Signpost pp. 275-301.

Sword-Sayer MAS, Brissette JC, Barnett JP (2005) Root growth and hydraulic conductivity of southern pine seedlings in response to soil temperature and water availability after planting. New For 30:253-272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-005-7481-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-005-7481-x

Sysoeva MI, Markovskaya EF (2006) PhotoThermal model of plant development. Rus J Plant Dev Biol 37:16-21. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062360406010036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062360406010036

Teskey RO, Hinckley TM (1986) Moisture: effects of water stress on trees. In: Hennessey TC, Dougherty PM, Kossuth SV, Johnson JD (eds) Proceedings of the physiology working group technical session. SAF National Convention: Stress Physiology and Forest Productivity. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 9-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4424-4_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4424-4_2

Teskey RO, Will RE (1999) Acclimation of loblolly pine seedlings to high temperatures. Tree Physiol 19:519-525. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/19.8.519 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/19.8.519

Teskey RO, Fites JA, Samuelson LJ, Bongarten BC (1986) Stomatal and nonstomatal limitations to net photosynthesis in Pinus taeda L. under different environmental conditions. Tree Physiol 2:131-142. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/2.1-2-3.131 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/2.1-2-3.131

Teskey RO, Bongarten B, Cregg, BM, Dougherty PM, Hennessey TC (1987) Physiology and genetics of tree growth response to moisture and temperature stress: an examination of the characteristics of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Tree Physiol 3:41-61. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/3.1.41 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/3.1.41

Timmis R, Tanaka Y (1976) Effects of container density and plant water stress on growth and cold hardiness of Douglas-fir seedlings. For Sci 22:167-172.

Tschaplinski TJ, Blake TJ (1985) Effects of root restriction on growth correlations, water relations, and senescence of alder seedlings. Physiol Plant 64:167-176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1985.tb02331.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1985.tb02331.x

Wang JY (1960) A Critique of the Heat Unit Approach to Plant Response Studies. Ecol 41:785-790. https://doi.org/10.2307/1931815 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1931815

Will RE, Teskey RO (1997) Effect of elevated carbon dioxide concentration and root restriction on net photosynthesis, water relations and foliar carbohydrate status of loblolly pine seedlings. Tree Physiol 17:655-661. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/17.10.655 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/17.10.655

Downloads

Published

2019-12-31 — Updated on 2020-10-13

Versions

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

“Application of a PhotoThermal Model for Container-Grown Conifer Seedling Production”. REFORESTA, no. 8 (October 13, 2020): 1–16. Accessed November 2, 2024. https://journal.reforestationchallenges.org/index.php/REFOR/article/view/112.

Most read articles by the same author(s)