Annual Buletin for Serbia. (2018).
Bernier, P. Y., Lamhamedi, M. S., & Simpson, D. G. (1995). Shoot:Root ratio is of limited use in evaluating the quality of container conifer stock. Tree Planters’ Notes, 46(3), 102–106.
Cseresnyés, I., & Tamás, J. (n.d.). Evaluation of Austrian pine (Pinus nigra) plantations in Hungary with respect to nature conservation – a review. Tájökológiai Lapok, 12(2), 267–284. https://doi.org/10.56617/tl.3714
Cvjetićaninin, R., & Perović, M. (2010). Praktikum iz dendrologije.
Diaci, J., Adamič, T., Rozman, A., Fidej, G., & Roženbergar, D. (n.d.). Conversion of Pinus nigra Plantations with Natural Regeneration in the Slovenian Karst: The Importance of Intermediate, Gradually Formed Canopy Gaps. Forests, 10(12), 1136. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10121136
Dickson, A., Leaf, A. L., & Hosner, J. F. (1960). QUALITY APPRAISAL OF WHITE SPRUCE AND WHITE PINE SEEDLING STOCK IN NURSERIES. The Forestry Chronicle, 36(1), 10–13. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc36010-1
Driessche, R. van den. (1982). Relationship between spacing and nitrogen fertilization of seedlings in the nursery, seedling size, and outplanting performance. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 12(4), 865–875. https://doi.org/10.1139/x82-128
Dumroese, R. K., Landis, T. D., Pinto, J. R., Haase, D. L., Wilkinson, K. W., & Davis, A. S. (n.d.). Meeting Forest Restoration Challenges: Using the Target Plant Concept. REFORESTA, 1, 37–52. https://doi.org/10.21750/REFOR.1.03.3
Grossnickle, S. C. (2012). Why seedlings survive: influence of plant attributes. New Forests, 43(5–6), 711–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-012-9336-6
Ivetić, V., Grossnickle, S., & Škorić, M. (n.d.). Forecasting the field performance of Austrian pine seedlings using morphological attributes. IForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, 10(1), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1722-009
Ivetić, V., & Škorić, M. (2013). Annals of Forest Research, 56(2), 297–306.
McTague, J., & Tinus, R. (1996). Tree Planters Notes, 47, 16–23.
Mexal, J. G., & South, D. B. (1991). Bareroot Seedling Culture. In Forestry Sciences (pp. 89–115). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3800-0_6
Mexal, J., & Landis, T. (1990). 13–17.
Portoghesi, L., Consalvo, M., Angelini, A., Ferrari, B., Barbati, A., Castaldi, C., & Corona, P. (2013). Multifunctional management of mountain reforestations: thoughts and perspectives from a case study in Central Italy. L’Italia Forestale e Montana, 68(6), 305–315. https://doi.org/10.4129/ifm.2013.6.03
Rankovic, N. (2009). Afforestation in Serbia in the period 1961-2007 with special reference to Austrian pine and Scots pine. Glasnik Sumarskog Fakulteta, 99, 115–134. https://doi.org/10.2298/GSF0999115R
Rose, R., Carlson, W., & Morgan, P. (1990). 286.
South, D. B. (1993). Rationale for growing southern pine seedlings at low seedbed densities. New Forests, 7(1), 63–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00037473
Statistical Office of Republic Serbia. (2021).
Tomić, Rakonjac, & Isajev. (2011). Izbor vrsta za pošumljavanje i melioracije u centralnoj Srbiji.
Tuttle, C. L., South, D. B., Golden, M. S., & Meldahl, R. S. (1988). Initial Pinustaeda seedling height relationships with early survival and growth. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 18(7), 867–871. https://doi.org/10.1139/x88-133
(n.d.). Praktikum iz semansrtva, rasadničarstva I pošumljavanja. 1–213.
(1976). Effect of nursery practice on Pinus radiata seedling characteristics and field performance: I. Nursery seedbed density. NZJ For Sci, 6(1), 19–26.
(1977). Suggested minimum standards for containerised seedlings in Nova Scotia. M-X–69, 18.
(1987). Seedling production of forest and decorative trees and shrubs. 455.
(2000). Planting morphologically improved pine seedlings to increase survival and growth.
,
