Main Article Content
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License CCBY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Abbate L, Mercati F, Di Noto G, Heuertz M, Carimi F, Fatta del Bosco S, Schicchi R (2020) Genetic Distinctiveness Highlights the Conservation Value of a Sicilian Manna Ash Germplasm Collection Assigned to Fraxinus angustifolia (Oleaceae). Plants, 9 (8), 1035. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9081035
Andrić I (2018) Genotypic and phenological variability of Narrow-leaf ash (Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl.) in clonal seed orchards. PhD thesis, Faculty of Forestry, University of Zagreb, Croatia.
lack-Samuelsson S, Whiteley R E, Junzhan G (2003) Growth and leaf morphology response to drought stress in the riparian broadleaved tree Ulmus laevis (Pall.). Silvae genetica, 52(5-6):292-299.
Bobinac M, Andrašev S, Šijačić-Nikolić M (2010) Elements of growth and structure of narrow-leaved ash (Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl) annual seedlings in the nursery on fluvisol. Period Biol 112 (3):341-351.
Čortan D, Mačar V, Vukičević V, Šijačić-Nikolić M (2017) Morphometric variability of Narrow-leaved ash samaras at the test-tree level. Bulletin of the Faculty of Forestry 115: 55-64. https://doi.org/10.2298/GSF1715055C
Drvodelić D, Ugarković D, Oršanić M, Paulić V (2016) The Impact of Drought, Normal Watering and Substrate Saturation on the Morphological and Physiological Condition of Container Seedlings of Narrow-Leaved Ash (Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl). South-east European Forestry 7(2): 135-142. https://doi.org/10.15177/seefor.16-11
FRAXIGEN (2005) Ash species in Europe: biological characteristics and practical guidelines for sustainable use. A summary of findings from the FRAXIGEN project, EU project EVKCT- 00108. University of Oxford, Oxford.
Ivetić V, Devetaković J, Nonić M, Stanković D, Šijačić-Nikolić M (2016) Genetic diversity and forest reproductive material - from seed source selection to planting. iForest 9: 801-812. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1577-009
Ivetić V, Stjepanović S, Devetaković J, Stanković D, Škorić M (2014) Relationships between leaf traits and morphological attributes in one-year bareroot Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl. Seedling. Annals of Forest Research 57(2): 197-203. https://doi.org/10.15287/afr.2014.214
Jarni K (2009) Varijabilnost poljskega jasena (Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl) v Sloveniji. Magistarsko Delo. Ljubljana, Univerza v Ljubljani, Biotehniška fakulteta, Ljubljana.
Jarni K, Westergren M, Kraigher H, Brus R (2011) Morphological variability of Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl in the north-westrn Balkans. Acta Soc Bot Pol 80(3): 245-252.https://doi.org/10.5586/asbp.2011.014
Jeandroz S, Frascaria-Lacoste N, Bousquet J (1996) Molecular recognition of the closely related Fraxinus excelsior and F. oxyphylla (Oleaceae) by RAPD markers. Forest Genetics 3: 237-242.
Kerkez I, Nonić M, Devetaković J, Šijačić-Nikolić M, Ivetić V (2018) The effect of half-sib lines on morphological attributes of one-year old Fraxinus angustifolia seedlings. Reforesta 5: 15-21. https://doi.org/10.21750/REFOR.5.03.49
Kleiman D, Aarssen LW (2007) The leaf size/number trade-off in trees. J. Ecol. 95, 376-382. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01205.x
Koch GW, Sillett SC, Jennings GM, Davis SD (2004) The limits to tree height. Nature 428, 851-854. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02417
Kremer D, Jurišić-Grubešić R, Dubravac T (2010) Morphometric research of samaras of North American ash species from Croatian populations. Periodicum Biologorum 112(3): 333-339.
Long TJ, Jones RH (1996) Seedling growth strategies and seed size effects in fourteen oak species native to different soil moisture habitats. Trees 11: 1-8.https://doi.org/10.1007/s004680050051
Meier IC, Leuschner C (2008) Leaf size and leaf area index in Fagus sylvatica forests: competing effects of precipitation, temperature, and nitrogen availability. Ecosystems 11: 655-669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-008-9135-2
Niinemets Ü, Portsmuth A, Tobias M (2006) Leaf size modifies support biomass distribution among stems, petioles and mid-ribs in temperate plants. New Phytol. 171, 91-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01741.x
Papi RM, Spanos KA, Kyriakidi DA (2012) Genetic variation of Fraxinus angustifolia natural populations in Greece based on nuclear and chloroplast microsatellite markers. Eur J Forest Res 131:1151-1161.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-011-0586-1
Salinger MJ, SivakumarMVK, Motha R (2005) Reducing vulnerability of agriculture and forestry to climate variability and change: workshop summary and recommendations. Clim. Change 70: 341-362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-005-5954-8
Šrámek M, Čermák J (2012) The vertical leaf distribution of Ulmus laevis Pall., Trees 26 (6): 1781-1792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-012-0747-y
Temunović M, Franjić J, Satovic Z, Grgurev M, Frascaria-Lacoste N, Fernández-Manjarrés JF (2012) Environmental heterogeneity explains the genetic structure of continental and Mediterranean populations of Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl. PloS one, 7(8), e42764.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042764
Tomić Z (2004) Šumarska fitocenologija. Univerzitet u Beogradu, Šumarskifakultet, Beograd (1- 262).
Tozer WC, Rice B, Westoby M (2015) Evolutionary divergence of leaf width and its correlates. Am. J. Bot. 102: 367-378. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1400379
Wang C, He J, Zhao TH, Cao Y, Wang G, Sun B, Yan X, Guo W, LiMH (2019) The smaller the leaf is, the faster the leaf water loses in a temperate forest. Frontiers in plant science, 10:58. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00058
Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, Cavender-Bares J, Chapin T, Cornelissen JHC, Diemer M, Flexas J, Garnier E, Groom PK, Gulias J, Hikosaka K, Lamont BB, Lee T, Lee W, Lusk C, Midgley JJ, Navas ML, Niinemets Ü, Oleksyn J, Osada N, Poorter H, Poot P, Prior L, Pyankov VI, Roumet C, Thomas SC, Tjoelker MG, Veneklaas EJ, Villar R (2004). The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428, 821-827. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02403
Yang DM, Li GY, Sun SC(2008) The generality of leaf size versus number trade-off in temperate woody species. Ann. Bot. 102: 623-629. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcn135