Landscape approach to Forest landscape restoration (FLR): Case study of Surčin minicipality

Authors

  • Nevena Vasiljević University of Belgrade, Faculty of Forestry
  • Sandra Mitrović University of Belgrade, Faculty of Forestry https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0556-801X
  • Jovana Devetaković University of Belgrade, Faculty of Forestry
  • Marko Pešić Consulting Agency Belgrade

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21750/REFOR.18.05.121

Keywords:

forest landscape restoration (FLR), landscape planning , landscape approach, landscape character assessment, forest

Abstract

“Planning at the landscape scale” is the new paradigm of spatial development which embraces the management, protection, and restoration of the landscape character distinguished through “landscape approach” which differs from traditional sectoral and project-based approaches.

The institutionalization of “the planning at the landscape scale” has shown an upward trajectory since the Republic of Serbia ratified the European Landscape Convention (ELC). The ELC aims to promote the institutionalization of landscape planning, management, and protection across all landscapes, whether urban, rural, or natural. The landscape planning approach integrates the principles of landscape ecology, principles of landscape aesthetics, and transdisciplinary research. This approach is solution-oriented, aiming to preserve, restore, and enhance the landscape’s character – the distinctive structure and image of the landscape. It achieves this through the “conservation and development of landscape patterns (mosaic), considering land use, the relationship between built and open spaces, and the distinct qualities of the buildings." (Spatial Plan of the Republic of Serbia, 2035).

As one of the novel tools that can effectively support the achievement of national-level spatial planning objectives, the development of the Forest Landscape Restoration (FLR) methodology holds the potential for incorporating the following goals and principles related to landscape planning, protection, and sustainable utilization:

- Integrating the landscape approach (emphasizing the value of landscape character) into the forestry planning and management system;

- Forestry development aligned with the recognized values of the landscape character (quality objectives, landscape capacity, and sensitivity);

- Urban landscape restoration, preservation, and enhancement of the characteristic structure and image of landscapes through; a) establishing urban spatial order and preserving remnant elements of the rural landscape (reforestation and afforestation within agroforestry areas, peri-urban mosaics complexes, surface watercourses) in suburban areas; d) preserving space for green infrastructure development, as a measure of the city's adaptation to climate change, and creating a network of green and public spaces that connect the natural and cultural values of urban settlements.

In this paper, we present the Surčin Forest Landscape Restoration Plan case study, demonstrating landscape character assessment (LCA) as a research method. This method evaluates the sensitivity of landscape character, addressing both resource and visual aspects. The methodological approach seeks to address the critical questions of “what”, "where" and "how" in the context of establishing new forest areas within the broader landscape framework of the forest restoration plan. By providing a strategic and spatially informed approach, it ensures that the restoration efforts are not only ecologically sound but also optimally positioned to enhance the resilience, biodiversity, landscape diversity, and connectivity of forest ecosystems, as well as to improve the cultural ecosystem services of the Municipality of Surčin.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Nevena Vasiljević, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Forestry

    Full Professor at the University of Belgrade, Faculty of Forestry, Department of Landscape Architecture. 

  • Sandra Mitrović, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Forestry

    Research assistant at the University of Belgrade, Faculty of Forestry, Department of Landscape Architecture

  • Jovana Devetaković, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Forestry

    Associate Professor at the Department of Forestry and Nature Protection at the Faculty of Forestry

  • Marko Pešić, Consulting Agency Belgrade

    Senior Consultant in Public Policies

References

Albert C, von Haaren C, Vargas-Moreno J, Steinitz C (2015) Teaching Scenario-Based Planning for Sustainable Landscape Development: An Evaluation of Learning Effects in the Cagliari Studio Workshop. Sustainability 7:6872-6892 https://doi.org/10.3390/su7066872 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su7066872

Bell S, Apostol D (2008) Designing Sustainable Forest Landscapes. Taylor and Francis, London https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00005-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203936276

Bell S (ed) (2003) Crossplan: integrated, participatory landscape planning as a tool for rural development. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh. I-VI: 1-78.

Bergamini N, Blasiak R, Eyzaguirre P, Ichikawa K, Mijatovic D, Nakao F, Subramanian SM (2013) Indicators of Resilience in Socio-ecological Production Landscapes. United Nations University, United Nations University Institute of Advanced Studies.

Besseau P, Graham S, Christophersen T (2018) Restoring forests and landscapes: The key to a sustainable future. Global Partnership on Forest Landscape Restoration, Vienna, Austria.

Botequilha-Leitão A, Miller J, Ahern J, McGarigal K (2006) Measuring landscapes: A planner's handbook. Island Press.

Campagna M, Di Cesare EA, Cocco C (2020) Integrating Green-Infrastructures Design in Strategic Spatial Planning with Geodesign. Sustainability 12:1820. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051820 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051820

CoE-Council of Europe (2000) European Landscape Convention https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list?module=signatures-by-treaty&treatynum=176

Gavrilović S, Vasiljević N, Radić B, Pihler V (2017) Landscape metrics application in ecological and visual landscape assessment. Glasnik Šumarskog fakulteta 116: 29-50. https://doi.org/10.2298/GSF1716029G DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/GSF1716029G

Ćorović D, Milinković M, Vasiljević N, Tilinger D, Mitrović S, Vuksanović-Macura Z (2024) Investigating Spatial Criteria for the Urban Landscape Assessment of Mass Housing Heritage: The Case of the Central Zone of New Belgrade. Land 13:906 https://doi.org/10.3390/land13070906 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land13070906

General urban plan of Belgrade (''Official Gazette of the City of Belgrade''), No. 11/16;

Landscape Institute & I.E.M.A. (2011) Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment. Taylor & Francis.

Maginnis S, Rietbergen-McCracken J, Sarre A (2012) The Forest Landscape Restoration Handbook. Taylor and Francis, Hoboken. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849773010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849773010

Mansourian S, Vallauri D, Dudley N (2005) Forest restoration in landscapes. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-29112-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-29112-1

Mansourian S (2005) Overview of forest restoration strategies and terms. Forest Restoration in Landscapes 8-13. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-29112-1_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-29112-1_2

Mansourian S (2021) From landscape ecology to Forest Landscape Restoration. Landscape Ecology 36: 2443-2452 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01175-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01175-6

McGarigal K, Marks BJ (1995) Fragstats: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure https://doi.org/10.2737/PNW-GTR-351 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2737/PNW-GTR-351

Mitrović S, Vasiljević N, Pjanović B, Dabović T (2023) Assessing Urban Resilience with Geodesign: A Case Study of Urban Landscape Planning in Belgrade, Serbia. Land 12: 1939 https://doi.org/10.3390/land12101939 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land12101939

Orsi F, Geneletti D (2010) Identifying priority areas for Forest Landscape Restoration in Chiapas (Mexico): An operational approach combining ecological and socioeconomic criteria. Landscape and Urban Planning 94: 20-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.07.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.07.014

Prastacos P, Lagarias A, Chrysoulakis N (2017) Using the Urban Atlas dataset for estimating spatial metrics. Methodology and application in urban areas of Greece. Cybergeo. https://doi.org/10.4000/cybergeo.28051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/cybergeo.28051

Regional spatial plan of the administrative area of the city of Belgrade ("Official list of the city of Belgrade"), No. 10/2004.

Roe M (2008) How are we doing? Research to support the implementation of the ELC in England. Austin Court, Birmingham 19-25.

Roe M, Jones C, Mell C (2008) Research to Support the Implementation of the European Landscape Convention in England. Natural England.

Scottish Natural Heritage & The Countryside Agency (2002) Landscape Character Assessment Guidance for England and Scotland: Techniques and Criteria for Judging Capacity and Sensitivity. Scottish Natural Heritage & The Countryside Agency

Selman P (2006) Planning at the landscape scale. London and New York, Weve-Rabehl. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203696903 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203696903

Selman P (2010) Centenary paper: Landscape planning - preservation, conservation and sustainable development. Town Planning Review 81: 381-406. Liverpool University Press. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2010.13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2010.13

Spatial Plan for part of the city municipality of Surčin (Official Gazette of the City of Belgrade), No. 10/ 2012.

Spatial plan of the Republic of Serbia from 2010 to 2020 ("Official Gazette of the RS"), No. 88/10.

Spatial plan of the Republic of Serbia from 2021 to 2035 https://www.mgsi.gov.rs/sites/default/files/PPRS%20Nacrt.pdf

Steinitz C (2012) A Framework for Geodesign: Changing Geography by Design. Esri Press, Redlands, CA, USA.

Swanwick C (2002) Landscape character assessment. Guidance for England and Scotland. The Countryside Agency/Scottish National Heritage, Cheltenham/ Edinburgh.

Stanturf J, Mansourian S, Kleine M (2017) IMPLEMENTING FOREST LANDSCAPE RESTORATION: A Practitioner's Guide. International Union of Forest Research Organizations, Special Programme for Development of Capacities (IUFRO-SPDC). Vienna, Austria. 128 p. ISBN - 978-3-902762-78-8

Tudor C (2014) An approach to landscape character assessment. Natural England, York, UK

Tress B, Tress G, van der Valk A (2003) Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in landscape studies - the Wageningen DELTA approach. In Tress B, Tress G, van der Valk A and Fry G (eds.): Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Landscape Studies: Potential and Limitations, Wageningen University, Delta Series 2, 8-15.

UNESCO (2023) United National Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation: Convention concerning the Protection of World Cultural and Natural Heritage (adopted in 1972) https://whc.unesco.org/en/basictexts/

United Nations Framework Conference on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice. 2003. Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry: Definitions and Modalities for Including Afforestation and Reforestation Activities Under Article 12 of the Kyoto Protocol. Eighteenth session, Bonn, June 4-13, 2003.

Van Eetvelde V, Antrop M (2009) A stepwise multi-scaled landscape typology and characterization for trans-regional integration applied on the federal state of Belgium. Landsc Urban Plann 91 (3): 160-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.12.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.12.008

Vasiljević N (2018) Landscape planning: theory and methodology. Belgrade.

Vasiljević N, Radić B (2016) THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE: from conservation to planning concept. Glasnik Šumarskog fakulteta 114: 257-278. https://doi.org/10.2298/GSF1614257V DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/GSF1614257V

Vasiljevic N (2020) Landscape. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71065-5_5-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71065-5_5-1

Vasiljević N, Radić B, Matić A, Medojević E, Gavrilović S, Tutundžić A, Krč M, Ćorović D, Galečić N, Mitrović S, Pešikan D, Mićić S, Elčić I (2022) The Atlas of Belgrade's landscape character types: The new interpretation of the landscape value. In: Bevk T (ed) Book of Abstracts. University of Ljubljana - Biotechnical Faculty / Brussel: ECLAS European Council of Landscape Architecture Schools, p 144

Walz U, Stein C (2014) Indicators of Hemeroby for the monitoring of landscapes in Germany. Journal for Nature Conservation 22: 279-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2014.01.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2014.01.007

World Bank (2021) A catalog of nature-based solutions for Urban Resilience. https://doi.org/10.1596/36507 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/36507

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

Issue

Section

SPECIAL ISSUE: PEN-CAFoRR COST Action

How to Cite

Vasiljević, Nevena, Sandra Mitrović, Jovana Devetaković, and Marko Pešić. “Landscape Approach to Forest Landscape Restoration (FLR): Case Study of Surčin Minicipality”. REFORESTA, no. 18 (December 31, 2024): 83–106. Accessed February 22, 2025. https://journal.reforestationchallenges.org/index.php/REFOR/article/view/227.

Most read articles by the same author(s)